{"items":[{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9100, executor note.\nReserve berth 9100 for vessel VSL-9100 (idempotency key sat-k-9100), idempotent.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9100, executor note.\nReserve berth 9100 for vessel VSL-9100 (idempotency key sat-k-9100). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-01-0003","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for berth 9100?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9101, executor note.\nReserve berth 9101 for vessel VSL-9101 (idempotency key sat-k-9101), idempotent.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9101, executor note.\nReserve berth 9101 for vessel VSL-9101 (idempotency key sat-k-9101). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-02-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for berth 9101?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9102, executor note.\nReserve berth 9102 for vessel VSL-9102 (idempotency key sat-k-9102), idempotent.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9102, executor note.\nReserve berth 9102 for vessel VSL-9102 (idempotency key sat-k-9102). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-03-0010","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for berth 9102?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9103, executor note.\nReserve berth 9103 for vessel VSL-9103 (idempotency key sat-k-9103), idempotent.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9103, executor note.\nReserve berth 9103 for vessel VSL-9103 (idempotency key sat-k-9103). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-04-0007","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for berth 9103?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9104, executor note.\nReserve berth 9104 for vessel VSL-9104 (idempotency key sat-k-9104), idempotent.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9104, executor note.\nReserve berth 9104 for vessel VSL-9104 (idempotency key sat-k-9104). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-05-0001","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for berth 9104?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9105, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9105 in biobank rack BR-9105 (idempotency key sat-k-9105), idempotent.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9105, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9105 in biobank rack BR-9105 (idempotency key sat-k-9105). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-06-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for specimen SPC-9105?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9106, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9106 in biobank rack BR-9106 (idempotency key sat-k-9106), idempotent.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9106, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9106 in biobank rack BR-9106 (idempotency key sat-k-9106). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-07-0008","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for specimen SPC-9106?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9107, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9107 in biobank rack BR-9107 (idempotency key sat-k-9107), idempotent.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9107, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9107 in biobank rack BR-9107 (idempotency key sat-k-9107). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-08-0000","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for specimen SPC-9107?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9108, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9108 in biobank rack BR-9108 (idempotency key sat-k-9108), idempotent.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9108, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9108 in biobank rack BR-9108 (idempotency key sat-k-9108). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-09-0001","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for specimen SPC-9108?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9109, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9109 in biobank rack BR-9109 (idempotency key sat-k-9109), idempotent.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9109, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9109 in biobank rack BR-9109 (idempotency key sat-k-9109). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-10-0004","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for specimen SPC-9109?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9110, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9110 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9110), idempotent.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9110, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9110 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9110). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-11-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for credential EC-9110?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9111, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9111 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9111), idempotent.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9111, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9111 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9111). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-12-0010","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for credential EC-9111?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9112, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9112 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9112), idempotent.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9112, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9112 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9112). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-13-0000","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for credential EC-9112?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9113, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9113 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9113), idempotent.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9113, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9113 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9113). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-14-0000","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for credential EC-9113?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9114, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9114 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9114), idempotent.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9114, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9114 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9114). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-15-0004","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for credential EC-9114?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9115, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9115 for district D-9115 (idempotency key sat-k-9115), idempotent.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9115, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9115 for district D-9115 (idempotency key sat-k-9115). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-16-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for advisory ADV-9115?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9116, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9116 for district D-9116 (idempotency key sat-k-9116), idempotent.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9116, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9116 for district D-9116 (idempotency key sat-k-9116). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-17-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for advisory ADV-9116?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9117, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9117 for district D-9117 (idempotency key sat-k-9117), idempotent.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9117, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9117 for district D-9117 (idempotency key sat-k-9117). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-18-0001","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for advisory ADV-9117?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9118, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9118 for district D-9118 (idempotency key sat-k-9118), idempotent.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9118, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9118 for district D-9118 (idempotency key sat-k-9118). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-19-0000","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for advisory ADV-9118?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9119, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9119 for district D-9119 (idempotency key sat-k-9119), idempotent.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9119, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9119 for district D-9119 (idempotency key sat-k-9119). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-20-0003","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for advisory ADV-9119?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9120, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9120 to route ER-9120 (idempotency key sat-k-9120), idempotent.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9120, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9120 to route ER-9120 (idempotency key sat-k-9120). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-21-0003","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for coach BUS-9120?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9121, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9121 to route ER-9121 (idempotency key sat-k-9121), idempotent.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9121, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9121 to route ER-9121 (idempotency key sat-k-9121). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-22-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for coach BUS-9121?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9122, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9122 to route ER-9122 (idempotency key sat-k-9122), idempotent.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9122, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9122 to route ER-9122 (idempotency key sat-k-9122). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-23-0000","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for coach BUS-9122?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9123, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9123 to route ER-9123 (idempotency key sat-k-9123), idempotent.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9123, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9123 to route ER-9123 (idempotency key sat-k-9123). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-24-0004","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for coach BUS-9123?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9124, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9124 to route ER-9124 (idempotency key sat-k-9124), idempotent.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9124, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9124 to route ER-9124 (idempotency key sat-k-9124). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-25-0001","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for coach BUS-9124?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9125, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9125 for consignment CN-9125 (idempotency key sat-k-9125), idempotent.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9125, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9125 for consignment CN-9125 (idempotency key sat-k-9125). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-26-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for record CIR-9125?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9126, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9126 for consignment CN-9126 (idempotency key sat-k-9126), idempotent.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9126, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9126 for consignment CN-9126 (idempotency key sat-k-9126). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-27-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for record CIR-9126?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9127, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9127 for consignment CN-9127 (idempotency key sat-k-9127), idempotent.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9127, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9127 for consignment CN-9127 (idempotency key sat-k-9127). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-28-0002","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for record CIR-9127?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9128, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9128 for consignment CN-9128 (idempotency key sat-k-9128), idempotent.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9128, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9128 for consignment CN-9128 (idempotency key sat-k-9128). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-29-0000","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for record CIR-9128?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9129, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9129 for consignment CN-9129 (idempotency key sat-k-9129), idempotent.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9129, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9129 for consignment CN-9129 (idempotency key sat-k-9129). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-30-0003","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for record CIR-9129?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9130, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9130 for appliance AP-9130 (idempotency key sat-k-9130), idempotent.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9130, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9130 for appliance AP-9130 (idempotency key sat-k-9130). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-31-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for claim WC-9130?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9131, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9131 for appliance AP-9131 (idempotency key sat-k-9131), idempotent.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9131, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9131 for appliance AP-9131 (idempotency key sat-k-9131). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-32-0019","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for claim WC-9131?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9132, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9132 for appliance AP-9132 (idempotency key sat-k-9132), idempotent.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9132, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9132 for appliance AP-9132 (idempotency key sat-k-9132). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-33-0001","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for claim WC-9132?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9133, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9133 for appliance AP-9133 (idempotency key sat-k-9133), idempotent.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9133, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9133 for appliance AP-9133 (idempotency key sat-k-9133). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-34-0000","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for claim WC-9133?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9134, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9134 for appliance AP-9134 (idempotency key sat-k-9134), idempotent.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9134, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9134 for appliance AP-9134 (idempotency key sat-k-9134). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-35-0008","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for claim WC-9134?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9135, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9135 to collection MC-9135 (idempotency key sat-k-9135), idempotent.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9135, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9135 to collection MC-9135 (idempotency key sat-k-9135). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-36-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for accession MLA-9135?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9136, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9136 to collection MC-9136 (idempotency key sat-k-9136), idempotent.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9136, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9136 to collection MC-9136 (idempotency key sat-k-9136). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-37-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for accession MLA-9136?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9137, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9137 to collection MC-9137 (idempotency key sat-k-9137), idempotent.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9137, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9137 to collection MC-9137 (idempotency key sat-k-9137). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-38-0005","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for accession MLA-9137?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9138, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9138 to collection MC-9138 (idempotency key sat-k-9138), idempotent.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9138, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9138 to collection MC-9138 (idempotency key sat-k-9138). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-39-0002","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for accession MLA-9138?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9139, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9139 to collection MC-9139 (idempotency key sat-k-9139), idempotent.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9139, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9139 to collection MC-9139 (idempotency key sat-k-9139). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-idempotent-40-0000","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for accession MLA-9139?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"idempotent","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9200, executor note.\nReserve berth 9200 for vessel VSL-9200 (idempotency key sat-k-9200), no-retry.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9200, executor note.\nReserve berth 9200 for vessel VSL-9200 (idempotency key sat-k-9200). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-01-0000","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for berth 9200?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9201, executor note.\nReserve berth 9201 for vessel VSL-9201 (idempotency key sat-k-9201), no-retry.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9201, executor note.\nReserve berth 9201 for vessel VSL-9201 (idempotency key sat-k-9201). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-02-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for berth 9201?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9202, executor note.\nReserve berth 9202 for vessel VSL-9202 (idempotency key sat-k-9202), no-retry.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9202, executor note.\nReserve berth 9202 for vessel VSL-9202 (idempotency key sat-k-9202). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-03-0006","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for berth 9202?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9203, executor note.\nReserve berth 9203 for vessel VSL-9203 (idempotency key sat-k-9203), no-retry.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9203, executor note.\nReserve berth 9203 for vessel VSL-9203 (idempotency key sat-k-9203). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-04-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for berth 9203?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9204, executor note.\nReserve berth 9204 for vessel VSL-9204 (idempotency key sat-k-9204), no-retry.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9204, executor note.\nReserve berth 9204 for vessel VSL-9204 (idempotency key sat-k-9204). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-05-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for berth 9204?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9205, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9205 in biobank rack BR-9205 (idempotency key sat-k-9205), no-retry.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9205, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9205 in biobank rack BR-9205 (idempotency key sat-k-9205). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-06-0000","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for specimen SPC-9205?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9206, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9206 in biobank rack BR-9206 (idempotency key sat-k-9206), no-retry.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9206, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9206 in biobank rack BR-9206 (idempotency key sat-k-9206). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-07-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for specimen SPC-9206?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9207, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9207 in biobank rack BR-9207 (idempotency key sat-k-9207), no-retry.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9207, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9207 in biobank rack BR-9207 (idempotency key sat-k-9207). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-08-0004","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for specimen SPC-9207?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9208, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9208 in biobank rack BR-9208 (idempotency key sat-k-9208), no-retry.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9208, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9208 in biobank rack BR-9208 (idempotency key sat-k-9208). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-09-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for specimen SPC-9208?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9209, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9209 in biobank rack BR-9209 (idempotency key sat-k-9209), no-retry.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9209, executor note.\nRegister specimen SPC-9209 in biobank rack BR-9209 (idempotency key sat-k-9209). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-10-0002","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for specimen SPC-9209?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9210, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9210 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9210), no-retry.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9210, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9210 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9210). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-11-0004","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for credential EC-9210?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9211, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9211 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9211), no-retry.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9211, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9211 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9211). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-12-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for credential EC-9211?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9212, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9212 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9212), no-retry.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9212, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9212 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9212). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-13-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for credential EC-9212?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9213, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9213 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9213), no-retry.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9213, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9213 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9213). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-14-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for credential EC-9213?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9214, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9214 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9214), no-retry.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9214, executor note.\nActivate elevator credential EC-9214 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9214). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-15-0006","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for credential EC-9214?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9215, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9215 for district D-9215 (idempotency key sat-k-9215), no-retry.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9215, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9215 for district D-9215 (idempotency key sat-k-9215). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-16-0006","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for advisory ADV-9215?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9216, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9216 for district D-9216 (idempotency key sat-k-9216), no-retry.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9216, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9216 for district D-9216 (idempotency key sat-k-9216). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-17-0009","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for advisory ADV-9216?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9217, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9217 for district D-9217 (idempotency key sat-k-9217), no-retry.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9217, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9217 for district D-9217 (idempotency key sat-k-9217). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-18-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for advisory ADV-9217?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9218, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9218 for district D-9218 (idempotency key sat-k-9218), no-retry.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9218, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9218 for district D-9218 (idempotency key sat-k-9218). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-19-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for advisory ADV-9218?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9219, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9219 for district D-9219 (idempotency key sat-k-9219), no-retry.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9219, executor note.\nPublish storm-cell advisory ADV-9219 for district D-9219 (idempotency key sat-k-9219). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-20-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for advisory ADV-9219?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9220, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9220 to route ER-9220 (idempotency key sat-k-9220), no-retry.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9220, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9220 to route ER-9220 (idempotency key sat-k-9220). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-21-0006","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for coach BUS-9220?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9221, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9221 to route ER-9221 (idempotency key sat-k-9221), no-retry.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9221, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9221 to route ER-9221 (idempotency key sat-k-9221). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-22-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for coach BUS-9221?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9222, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9222 to route ER-9222 (idempotency key sat-k-9222), no-retry.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9222, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9222 to route ER-9222 (idempotency key sat-k-9222). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-23-0002","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for coach BUS-9222?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9223, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9223 to route ER-9223 (idempotency key sat-k-9223), no-retry.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9223, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9223 to route ER-9223 (idempotency key sat-k-9223). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-24-0004","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for coach BUS-9223?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9224, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9224 to route ER-9224 (idempotency key sat-k-9224), no-retry.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9224, executor note.\nAssign evacuation coach BUS-9224 to route ER-9224 (idempotency key sat-k-9224). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-25-0002","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for coach BUS-9224?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9225, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9225 for consignment CN-9225 (idempotency key sat-k-9225), no-retry.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9225, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9225 for consignment CN-9225 (idempotency key sat-k-9225). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-26-0000","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for record CIR-9225?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9226, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9226 for consignment CN-9226 (idempotency key sat-k-9226), no-retry.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9226, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9226 for consignment CN-9226 (idempotency key sat-k-9226). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-27-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for record CIR-9226?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9227, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9227 for consignment CN-9227 (idempotency key sat-k-9227), no-retry.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9227, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9227 for consignment CN-9227 (idempotency key sat-k-9227). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-28-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for record CIR-9227?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9228, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9228 for consignment CN-9228 (idempotency key sat-k-9228), no-retry.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9228, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9228 for consignment CN-9228 (idempotency key sat-k-9228). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-29-0004","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for record CIR-9228?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9229, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9229 for consignment CN-9229 (idempotency key sat-k-9229), no-retry.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9229, executor note.\nSeal customs inspection record CIR-9229 for consignment CN-9229 (idempotency key sat-k-9229). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-30-0004","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for record CIR-9229?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9230, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9230 for appliance AP-9230 (idempotency key sat-k-9230), no-retry.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9230, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9230 for appliance AP-9230 (idempotency key sat-k-9230). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-31-0001","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for claim WC-9230?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9231, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9231 for appliance AP-9231 (idempotency key sat-k-9231), no-retry.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9231, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9231 for appliance AP-9231 (idempotency key sat-k-9231). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-32-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for claim WC-9231?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9232, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9232 for appliance AP-9232 (idempotency key sat-k-9232), no-retry.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9232, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9232 for appliance AP-9232 (idempotency key sat-k-9232). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-33-0005","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for claim WC-9232?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9233, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9233 for appliance AP-9233 (idempotency key sat-k-9233), no-retry.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9233, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9233 for appliance AP-9233 (idempotency key sat-k-9233). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-34-0003","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for claim WC-9233?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9234, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9234 for appliance AP-9234 (idempotency key sat-k-9234), no-retry.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9234, executor note.\nOpen warranty claim WC-9234 for appliance AP-9234 (idempotency key sat-k-9234). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-35-0003","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for claim WC-9234?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9235, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9235 to collection MC-9235 (idempotency key sat-k-9235), no-retry.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9235, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9235 to collection MC-9235 (idempotency key sat-k-9235). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service connection closed after submission; the executor cannot tell whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-36-0014","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for accession MLA-9235?","scenario":"timeout","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9236, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9236 to collection MC-9236 (idempotency key sat-k-9236), no-retry.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","answer":"Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","english":"Operations record SAT-9236, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9236 to collection MC-9236 (idempotency key sat-k-9236). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service has verified that it received no request and made no change.","gold_key":"C","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-37-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for accession MLA-9236?","scenario":"verified-none","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9237, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9237 to collection MC-9237 (idempotency key sat-k-9237), no-retry.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9237, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9237 to collection MC-9237 (idempotency key sat-k-9237). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service reports that processing stopped after a partial write whose extent is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-38-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for accession MLA-9237?","scenario":"partial","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9238, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9238 to collection MC-9238 (idempotency key sat-k-9238), no-retry.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9238, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9238 to collection MC-9238 (idempotency key sat-k-9238). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe service confirms completion, but a colleague proposes another execution as a precaution.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-39-0003","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for accession MLA-9238?","scenario":"confirmed-again","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9239, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9239 to collection MC-9239 (idempotency key sat-k-9239), no-retry.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9239, executor note.\nCommit museum-loan accession MLA-9239 to collection MC-9239 (idempotency key sat-k-9239). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA delayed response arrived damaged, so the executor still cannot determine whether the operation completed.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-no-retry-40-0004","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which next step does this record support for accession MLA-9239?","scenario":"late-ambiguous","settlement_stratum":"no-retry","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9400, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Reserve berth 9400 for vessel VSL-9400 (idempotency key sat-k-9400), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Reserve berth 9400 for vessel VSL-9400 (idempotency key sat-k-9400-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9400, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Reserve berth 9400 for vessel VSL-9400 (idempotency key sat-k-9400). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Reserve berth 9400 for vessel VSL-9400 (idempotency key sat-k-9400-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-01-0001","options":["This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning berth 9400?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9400-new","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"key-shift"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9401, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Reserve berth 9401 for vessel VSL-9401 (idempotency key sat-k-9401), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Reserve berth 9401 for vessel VSL-X9401 (idempotency key sat-k-9401). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9401, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Reserve berth 9401 for vessel VSL-9401 (idempotency key sat-k-9401). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Reserve berth 9401 for vessel VSL-X9401 (idempotency key sat-k-9401). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-02-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning berth 9401?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9401","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"parameter-shift"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9402, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Reserve berth 9402 for vessel VSL-9402 (idempotency key sat-k-9402), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Reserve berth 9402 for vessel VSL-9402 (idempotency key sat-k-9402). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9402, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Reserve berth 9402 for vessel VSL-9402 (idempotency key sat-k-9402). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Reserve berth 9402 for vessel VSL-9402 (idempotency key sat-k-9402). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-03-0009","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning berth 9402?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9402","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"state-shift"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9403, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Reserve berth 9403 for vessel VSL-9403 (idempotency key sat-k-9403), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Reserve berth 9403 for vessel VSL-9403 (idempotency key sat-k-9403). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9403, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Reserve berth 9403 for vessel VSL-9403 (idempotency key sat-k-9403). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Reserve berth 9403 for vessel VSL-9403 (idempotency key sat-k-9403). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-04-0007","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning berth 9403?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9403","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"same-idempotent"},{"action":0,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9404, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Reserve berth 9404 for vessel VSL-9404 (idempotency key sat-k-9404), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Reserve berth 9404 for vessel VSL-9404 (idempotency key sat-k-9404). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9404, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Reserve berth 9404 for vessel VSL-9404 (idempotency key sat-k-9404). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Reserve berth 9404 for vessel VSL-9404 (idempotency key sat-k-9404). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-05-0005","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning berth 9404?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9404","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"same-no-retry"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9405, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Register specimen SPC-9405 in biobank rack BR-9405 (idempotency key sat-k-9405), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Register specimen SPC-9405 in biobank rack BR-9405 (idempotency key sat-k-9405-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9405, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Register specimen SPC-9405 in biobank rack BR-9405 (idempotency key sat-k-9405). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Register specimen SPC-9405 in biobank rack BR-9405 (idempotency key sat-k-9405-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-06-0000","options":["This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning specimen SPC-9405?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9405-new","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"key-shift"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9406, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Register specimen SPC-9406 in biobank rack BR-9406 (idempotency key sat-k-9406), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Register specimen SPC-9406 in biobank rack BR-X9406 (idempotency key sat-k-9406). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9406, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Register specimen SPC-9406 in biobank rack BR-9406 (idempotency key sat-k-9406). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Register specimen SPC-9406 in biobank rack BR-X9406 (idempotency key sat-k-9406). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-07-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning specimen SPC-9406?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9406","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"parameter-shift"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9407, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Register specimen SPC-9407 in biobank rack BR-9407 (idempotency key sat-k-9407), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Register specimen SPC-9407 in biobank rack BR-9407 (idempotency key sat-k-9407). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9407, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Register specimen SPC-9407 in biobank rack BR-9407 (idempotency key sat-k-9407). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Register specimen SPC-9407 in biobank rack BR-9407 (idempotency key sat-k-9407). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-08-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning specimen SPC-9407?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9407","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"state-shift"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9408, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Register specimen SPC-9408 in biobank rack BR-9408 (idempotency key sat-k-9408), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Register specimen SPC-9408 in biobank rack BR-9408 (idempotency key sat-k-9408). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9408, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Register specimen SPC-9408 in biobank rack BR-9408 (idempotency key sat-k-9408). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Register specimen SPC-9408 in biobank rack BR-9408 (idempotency key sat-k-9408). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-09-0000","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning specimen SPC-9408?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9408","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"same-idempotent"},{"action":1,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9409, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Register specimen SPC-9409 in biobank rack BR-9409 (idempotency key sat-k-9409), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Register specimen SPC-9409 in biobank rack BR-9409 (idempotency key sat-k-9409). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9409, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Register specimen SPC-9409 in biobank rack BR-9409 (idempotency key sat-k-9409). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Register specimen SPC-9409 in biobank rack BR-9409 (idempotency key sat-k-9409). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-10-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning specimen SPC-9409?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9409","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"same-no-retry"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9410, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Activate elevator credential EC-9410 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9410), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Activate elevator credential EC-9410 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9410-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9410, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Activate elevator credential EC-9410 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9410). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Activate elevator credential EC-9410 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9410-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-11-0000","options":["This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning credential EC-9410?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9410-new","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"key-shift"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9411, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Activate elevator credential EC-9411 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9411), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Activate elevator credential EC-9411 for floors 8 through 11 (idempotency key sat-k-9411). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9411, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Activate elevator credential EC-9411 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9411). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Activate elevator credential EC-9411 for floors 8 through 11 (idempotency key sat-k-9411). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-12-0006","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning credential EC-9411?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9411","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"parameter-shift"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9412, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Activate elevator credential EC-9412 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9412), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Activate elevator credential EC-9412 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9412). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9412, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Activate elevator credential EC-9412 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9412). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Activate elevator credential EC-9412 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9412). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-13-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning credential EC-9412?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9412","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"state-shift"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9413, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Activate elevator credential EC-9413 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9413), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Activate elevator credential EC-9413 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9413). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9413, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Activate elevator credential EC-9413 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9413). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Activate elevator credential EC-9413 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9413). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-14-0002","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning credential EC-9413?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9413","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"same-idempotent"},{"action":2,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9414, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Activate elevator credential EC-9414 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9414), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Activate elevator credential EC-9414 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9414). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9414, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Activate elevator credential EC-9414 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9414). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Activate elevator credential EC-9414 for floors 4 through 7 (idempotency key sat-k-9414). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-15-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning credential EC-9414?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9414","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"same-no-retry"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9415, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9415 for district D-9415 (idempotency key sat-k-9415), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9415 for district D-9415 (idempotency key sat-k-9415-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9415, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9415 for district D-9415 (idempotency key sat-k-9415). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9415 for district D-9415 (idempotency key sat-k-9415-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-16-0001","options":["This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning advisory ADV-9415?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9415-new","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"key-shift"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9416, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9416 for district D-9416 (idempotency key sat-k-9416), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9416 for district DX-9416 (idempotency key sat-k-9416). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9416, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9416 for district D-9416 (idempotency key sat-k-9416). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9416 for district DX-9416 (idempotency key sat-k-9416). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-17-0002","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning advisory ADV-9416?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9416","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"parameter-shift"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9417, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9417 for district D-9417 (idempotency key sat-k-9417), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9417 for district D-9417 (idempotency key sat-k-9417). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9417, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9417 for district D-9417 (idempotency key sat-k-9417). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9417 for district D-9417 (idempotency key sat-k-9417). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-18-0003","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning advisory ADV-9417?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9417","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"state-shift"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9418, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9418 for district D-9418 (idempotency key sat-k-9418), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9418 for district D-9418 (idempotency key sat-k-9418). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9418, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9418 for district D-9418 (idempotency key sat-k-9418). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9418 for district D-9418 (idempotency key sat-k-9418). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-19-0012","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning advisory ADV-9418?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9418","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"same-idempotent"},{"action":3,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9419, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9419 for district D-9419 (idempotency key sat-k-9419), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9419 for district D-9419 (idempotency key sat-k-9419). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9419, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9419 for district D-9419 (idempotency key sat-k-9419). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Publish storm-cell advisory ADV-9419 for district D-9419 (idempotency key sat-k-9419). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-20-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning advisory ADV-9419?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9419","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"same-no-retry"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9420, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9420 to route ER-9420 (idempotency key sat-k-9420), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9420 to route ER-9420 (idempotency key sat-k-9420-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9420, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9420 to route ER-9420 (idempotency key sat-k-9420). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9420 to route ER-9420 (idempotency key sat-k-9420-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-21-0003","options":["This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning coach BUS-9420?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9420-new","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"key-shift"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9421, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9421 to route ER-9421 (idempotency key sat-k-9421), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9421 to route ER-X9421 (idempotency key sat-k-9421). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9421, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9421 to route ER-9421 (idempotency key sat-k-9421). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9421 to route ER-X9421 (idempotency key sat-k-9421). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-22-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning coach BUS-9421?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9421","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"parameter-shift"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9422, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9422 to route ER-9422 (idempotency key sat-k-9422), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9422 to route ER-9422 (idempotency key sat-k-9422). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9422, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9422 to route ER-9422 (idempotency key sat-k-9422). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9422 to route ER-9422 (idempotency key sat-k-9422). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-23-0003","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning coach BUS-9422?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9422","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"state-shift"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9423, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9423 to route ER-9423 (idempotency key sat-k-9423), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9423 to route ER-9423 (idempotency key sat-k-9423). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9423, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9423 to route ER-9423 (idempotency key sat-k-9423). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9423 to route ER-9423 (idempotency key sat-k-9423). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-24-0003","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning coach BUS-9423?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9423","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"same-idempotent"},{"action":4,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9424, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9424 to route ER-9424 (idempotency key sat-k-9424), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9424 to route ER-9424 (idempotency key sat-k-9424). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9424, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9424 to route ER-9424 (idempotency key sat-k-9424). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Assign evacuation coach BUS-9424 to route ER-9424 (idempotency key sat-k-9424). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-25-0002","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning coach BUS-9424?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9424","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"same-no-retry"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9425, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9425 for consignment CN-9425 (idempotency key sat-k-9425), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9425 for consignment CN-9425 (idempotency key sat-k-9425-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9425, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9425 for consignment CN-9425 (idempotency key sat-k-9425). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9425 for consignment CN-9425 (idempotency key sat-k-9425-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-26-0003","options":["This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning record CIR-9425?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9425-new","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"key-shift"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9426, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9426 for consignment CN-9426 (idempotency key sat-k-9426), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9426 for consignment CN-X9426 (idempotency key sat-k-9426). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9426, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9426 for consignment CN-9426 (idempotency key sat-k-9426). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9426 for consignment CN-X9426 (idempotency key sat-k-9426). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-27-0002","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning record CIR-9426?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9426","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"parameter-shift"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9427, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9427 for consignment CN-9427 (idempotency key sat-k-9427), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9427 for consignment CN-9427 (idempotency key sat-k-9427). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9427, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9427 for consignment CN-9427 (idempotency key sat-k-9427). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9427 for consignment CN-9427 (idempotency key sat-k-9427). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-28-0013","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning record CIR-9427?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9427","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"state-shift"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9428, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9428 for consignment CN-9428 (idempotency key sat-k-9428), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9428 for consignment CN-9428 (idempotency key sat-k-9428). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9428, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9428 for consignment CN-9428 (idempotency key sat-k-9428). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9428 for consignment CN-9428 (idempotency key sat-k-9428). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-29-0000","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning record CIR-9428?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9428","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"same-idempotent"},{"action":5,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9429, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9429 for consignment CN-9429 (idempotency key sat-k-9429), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9429 for consignment CN-9429 (idempotency key sat-k-9429). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9429, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9429 for consignment CN-9429 (idempotency key sat-k-9429). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Seal customs inspection record CIR-9429 for consignment CN-9429 (idempotency key sat-k-9429). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-30-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning record CIR-9429?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9429","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"same-no-retry"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9430, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Open warranty claim WC-9430 for appliance AP-9430 (idempotency key sat-k-9430), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Open warranty claim WC-9430 for appliance AP-9430 (idempotency key sat-k-9430-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9430, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Open warranty claim WC-9430 for appliance AP-9430 (idempotency key sat-k-9430). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Open warranty claim WC-9430 for appliance AP-9430 (idempotency key sat-k-9430-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-31-0000","options":["This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning claim WC-9430?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9430-new","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"key-shift"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9431, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Open warranty claim WC-9431 for appliance AP-9431 (idempotency key sat-k-9431), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Open warranty claim WC-9431 for appliance AP-X9431 (idempotency key sat-k-9431). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9431, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Open warranty claim WC-9431 for appliance AP-9431 (idempotency key sat-k-9431). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Open warranty claim WC-9431 for appliance AP-X9431 (idempotency key sat-k-9431). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-32-0002","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning claim WC-9431?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9431","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"parameter-shift"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9432, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Open warranty claim WC-9432 for appliance AP-9432 (idempotency key sat-k-9432), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Open warranty claim WC-9432 for appliance AP-9432 (idempotency key sat-k-9432). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9432, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Open warranty claim WC-9432 for appliance AP-9432 (idempotency key sat-k-9432). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Open warranty claim WC-9432 for appliance AP-9432 (idempotency key sat-k-9432). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-33-0007","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning claim WC-9432?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9432","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"state-shift"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9433, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Open warranty claim WC-9433 for appliance AP-9433 (idempotency key sat-k-9433), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Open warranty claim WC-9433 for appliance AP-9433 (idempotency key sat-k-9433). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9433, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Open warranty claim WC-9433 for appliance AP-9433 (idempotency key sat-k-9433). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Open warranty claim WC-9433 for appliance AP-9433 (idempotency key sat-k-9433). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-34-0003","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning claim WC-9433?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9433","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"same-idempotent"},{"action":6,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9434, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Open warranty claim WC-9434 for appliance AP-9434 (idempotency key sat-k-9434), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Open warranty claim WC-9434 for appliance AP-9434 (idempotency key sat-k-9434). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9434, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Open warranty claim WC-9434 for appliance AP-9434 (idempotency key sat-k-9434). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Open warranty claim WC-9434 for appliance AP-9434 (idempotency key sat-k-9434). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-35-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning claim WC-9434?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9434","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"same-no-retry"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9435, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9435 to collection MC-9435 (idempotency key sat-k-9435), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9435 to collection MC-9435 (idempotency key sat-k-9435-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9435, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9435 to collection MC-9435 (idempotency key sat-k-9435). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9435 to collection MC-9435 (idempotency key sat-k-9435-new). Its key differs from Request 1's key.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":0,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-36-0006","options":["This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning accession MLA-9435?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9435-new","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"key-shift"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9436, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9436 to collection MC-9436 (idempotency key sat-k-9436), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9436 to collection MC-X9436 (idempotency key sat-k-9436). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9436, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9436 to collection MC-9436 (idempotency key sat-k-9436). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9436 to collection MC-X9436 (idempotency key sat-k-9436). Its action parameter differs from Request 1's parameter.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":1,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-37-0001","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning accession MLA-9436?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9436","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"parameter-shift"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9437, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9437 to collection MC-9437 (idempotency key sat-k-9437), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9437 to collection MC-9437 (idempotency key sat-k-9437). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","english":"Operations record SAT-9437, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9437 to collection MC-9437 (idempotency key sat-k-9437). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9437 to collection MC-9437 (idempotency key sat-k-9437). It was issued after the service reported a relevant-state version change on this target.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"E","gold_position":2,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-38-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning accession MLA-9437?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9437","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"state-shift"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9438, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9438 to collection MC-9438 (idempotency key sat-k-9438), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9438 to collection MC-9438 (idempotency key sat-k-9438). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","english":"Operations record SAT-9438, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9438 to collection MC-9438 (idempotency key sat-k-9438). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9438 to collection MC-9438 (idempotency key sat-k-9438). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"A","gold_position":3,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-39-0003","options":["Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning accession MLA-9438?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9438","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"idempotent","transfer":"same-idempotent"},{"action":7,"ainglish":"Operations record SAT-9439, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9439 to collection MC-9439 (idempotency key sat-k-9439), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9439 to collection MC-9439 (idempotency key sat-k-9439). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","answer":"Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting.","english":"Operations record SAT-9439, two-request executor note.\nRequest 1: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9439 to collection MC-9439 (idempotency key sat-k-9439). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (duplicate allocation, duplicate notice, or corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Commit museum-loan accession MLA-9439 to collection MC-9439 (idempotency key sat-k-9439). It repeats the same action, parameters, key, and relevant state as Request 1.\nThe record does not state that Request 1's retry tag carries across any changed action, parameter, key, or relevant state. Request 2 timed out after submission; whether it completed is unknown.","gold_key":"B","gold_position":4,"id":"sat-inr-20260926-transfer-40-0000","options":["Repeat it now without checking; another execution leaves the final outcome exactly as the first execution left it.","Execute it once now; the service verified that the earlier attempt did not occur.","Never execute this action again under any circumstances, whatever later verification establishes.","This record does not establish which retry policy applies to that request.","Do not repeat it blindly; another execution changes the result, so verify the first outcome or escalate before acting."],"question":"Which retry policy does the record establish for Request 2 concerning accession MLA-9439?","request_2_key":"sat-k-9439","settlement_stratum":"transfer","status":"ORIGINAL_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT","tag_on_request_1":"no-retry","transfer":"same-no-retry"},{"ainglish":"Control record 801: Pilot-Azure-101, not Pilot-Lilac-101, is responsible. Quay-Amber-301, not Quay-Coral-301, is the destination.","answer":"Pilot-Azure-101 / Quay-Amber-301","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 801: either Pilot-Azure-101 or Pilot-Lilac-101 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Quay-Amber-301 or Quay-Coral-301 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-01","options":["Pilot-Azure-101 / Quay-Amber-301","Pilot-Azure-101 / Quay-Coral-301","Pilot-Lilac-101 / Quay-Amber-301","Pilot-Lilac-101 / Quay-Coral-301","Pilot established; quay not established.","Pilot not established; quay established.","Neither pilot nor quay established.","The record contradicts itself."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 802: Curator-Copper-102, not Curator-Silver-102, is responsible. Hangar-Indigo-302, not Hangar-Jade-302, is the destination.","answer":"Curator-Copper-102 / Hangar-Indigo-302","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 802: either Curator-Copper-102 or Curator-Silver-102 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Hangar-Indigo-302 or Hangar-Jade-302 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-02","options":["Curator not established; hangar established.","Neither curator nor hangar established.","The record contradicts itself.","Curator-Copper-102 / Hangar-Indigo-302","Curator-Copper-102 / Hangar-Jade-302","Curator-Silver-102 / Hangar-Indigo-302","Curator-Silver-102 / Hangar-Jade-302","Curator established; hangar not established."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 803: Steward-Lilac-103, not Steward-Amber-103, is responsible. Harbor-Coral-303, not Harbor-Azure-303, is the destination.","answer":"Steward-Lilac-103 / Harbor-Coral-303","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 803: either Steward-Lilac-103 or Steward-Amber-103 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Harbor-Coral-303 or Harbor-Azure-303 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-03","options":["Steward-Amber-103 / Harbor-Coral-303","Steward-Amber-103 / Harbor-Azure-303","Steward established; harbor not established.","Steward not established; harbor established.","Neither steward nor harbor established.","The record contradicts itself.","Steward-Lilac-103 / Harbor-Coral-303","Steward-Lilac-103 / Harbor-Azure-303"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 804: Marshal-Silver-104, not Marshal-Indigo-104, is responsible. Atrium-Jade-304, not Atrium-Copper-304, is the destination.","answer":"Marshal-Silver-104 / Atrium-Jade-304","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 804: either Marshal-Silver-104 or Marshal-Indigo-104 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Atrium-Jade-304 or Atrium-Copper-304 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-04","options":["The record contradicts itself.","Marshal-Silver-104 / Atrium-Jade-304","Marshal-Silver-104 / Atrium-Copper-304","Marshal-Indigo-104 / Atrium-Jade-304","Marshal-Indigo-104 / Atrium-Copper-304","Marshal established; atrium not established.","Marshal not established; atrium established.","Neither marshal nor atrium established."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 805: Warden-Amber-105, not Warden-Coral-105, is responsible. Orchard-Azure-305, not Orchard-Lilac-305, is the destination.","answer":"Warden-Amber-105 / Orchard-Azure-305","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 805: either Warden-Amber-105 or Warden-Coral-105 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Orchard-Azure-305 or Orchard-Lilac-305 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-05","options":["Warden established; orchard not established.","Warden not established; orchard established.","Neither warden nor orchard established.","The record contradicts itself.","Warden-Amber-105 / Orchard-Azure-305","Warden-Amber-105 / Orchard-Lilac-305","Warden-Coral-105 / Orchard-Azure-305","Warden-Coral-105 / Orchard-Lilac-305"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 806: Keeper-Indigo-106, not Keeper-Jade-106, is responsible. Annex-Copper-306, not Annex-Silver-306, is the destination.","answer":"Keeper-Indigo-106 / Annex-Copper-306","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 806: either Keeper-Indigo-106 or Keeper-Jade-106 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Annex-Copper-306 or Annex-Silver-306 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-06","options":["Keeper-Indigo-106 / Annex-Silver-306","Keeper-Jade-106 / Annex-Copper-306","Keeper-Jade-106 / Annex-Silver-306","Keeper established; annex not established.","Keeper not established; annex established.","Neither keeper nor annex established.","The record contradicts itself.","Keeper-Indigo-106 / Annex-Copper-306"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 807: Ranger-Coral-107, not Ranger-Azure-107, is responsible. Gallery-Lilac-307, not Gallery-Amber-307, is the destination.","answer":"Ranger-Coral-107 / Gallery-Lilac-307","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 807: either Ranger-Coral-107 or Ranger-Azure-107 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Gallery-Lilac-307 or Gallery-Amber-307 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-07","options":["Neither ranger nor gallery established.","The record contradicts itself.","Ranger-Coral-107 / Gallery-Lilac-307","Ranger-Coral-107 / Gallery-Amber-307","Ranger-Azure-107 / Gallery-Lilac-307","Ranger-Azure-107 / Gallery-Amber-307","Ranger established; gallery not established.","Ranger not established; gallery established."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 808: Porter-Jade-108, not Porter-Copper-108, is responsible. Depot-Silver-308, not Depot-Indigo-308, is the destination.","answer":"Porter-Jade-108 / Depot-Silver-308","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 808: either Porter-Jade-108 or Porter-Copper-108 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Depot-Silver-308 or Depot-Indigo-308 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-08","options":["Porter-Copper-108 / Depot-Indigo-308","Porter established; depot not established.","Porter not established; depot established.","Neither porter nor depot established.","The record contradicts itself.","Porter-Jade-108 / Depot-Silver-308","Porter-Jade-108 / Depot-Indigo-308","Porter-Copper-108 / Depot-Silver-308"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 809: Pilot-Azure-109, not Pilot-Lilac-109, is responsible. Quay-Amber-309, not Quay-Coral-309, is the destination.","answer":"Pilot-Azure-109 / Quay-Amber-309","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 809: either Pilot-Azure-109 or Pilot-Lilac-109 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Quay-Amber-309 or Quay-Coral-309 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-09","options":["Pilot-Azure-109 / Quay-Amber-309","Pilot-Azure-109 / Quay-Coral-309","Pilot-Lilac-109 / Quay-Amber-309","Pilot-Lilac-109 / Quay-Coral-309","Pilot established; quay not established.","Pilot not established; quay established.","Neither pilot nor quay established.","The record contradicts itself."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 810: Curator-Copper-110, not Curator-Silver-110, is responsible. Hangar-Indigo-310, not Hangar-Jade-310, is the destination.","answer":"Curator-Copper-110 / Hangar-Indigo-310","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 810: either Curator-Copper-110 or Curator-Silver-110 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Hangar-Indigo-310 or Hangar-Jade-310 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-10","options":["Curator not established; hangar established.","Neither curator nor hangar established.","The record contradicts itself.","Curator-Copper-110 / Hangar-Indigo-310","Curator-Copper-110 / Hangar-Jade-310","Curator-Silver-110 / Hangar-Indigo-310","Curator-Silver-110 / Hangar-Jade-310","Curator established; hangar not established."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 811: Steward-Lilac-111, not Steward-Amber-111, is responsible. Harbor-Coral-311, not Harbor-Azure-311, is the destination.","answer":"Steward-Lilac-111 / Harbor-Coral-311","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 811: either Steward-Lilac-111 or Steward-Amber-111 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Harbor-Coral-311 or Harbor-Azure-311 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-11","options":["Steward-Amber-111 / Harbor-Coral-311","Steward-Amber-111 / Harbor-Azure-311","Steward established; harbor not established.","Steward not established; harbor established.","Neither steward nor harbor established.","The record contradicts itself.","Steward-Lilac-111 / Harbor-Coral-311","Steward-Lilac-111 / Harbor-Azure-311"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 812: Marshal-Silver-112, not Marshal-Indigo-112, is responsible. Atrium-Jade-312, not Atrium-Copper-312, is the destination.","answer":"Marshal-Silver-112 / Atrium-Jade-312","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 812: either Marshal-Silver-112 or Marshal-Indigo-112 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Atrium-Jade-312 or Atrium-Copper-312 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-12","options":["The record contradicts itself.","Marshal-Silver-112 / Atrium-Jade-312","Marshal-Silver-112 / Atrium-Copper-312","Marshal-Indigo-112 / Atrium-Jade-312","Marshal-Indigo-112 / Atrium-Copper-312","Marshal established; atrium not established.","Marshal not established; atrium established.","Neither marshal nor atrium established."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 813: Warden-Amber-113, not Warden-Coral-113, is responsible. Orchard-Azure-313, not Orchard-Lilac-313, is the destination.","answer":"Warden-Amber-113 / Orchard-Azure-313","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 813: either Warden-Amber-113 or Warden-Coral-113 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Orchard-Azure-313 or Orchard-Lilac-313 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-13","options":["Warden established; orchard not established.","Warden not established; orchard established.","Neither warden nor orchard established.","The record contradicts itself.","Warden-Amber-113 / Orchard-Azure-313","Warden-Amber-113 / Orchard-Lilac-313","Warden-Coral-113 / Orchard-Azure-313","Warden-Coral-113 / Orchard-Lilac-313"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 814: Keeper-Indigo-114, not Keeper-Jade-114, is responsible. Annex-Copper-314, not Annex-Silver-314, is the destination.","answer":"Keeper-Indigo-114 / Annex-Copper-314","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 814: either Keeper-Indigo-114 or Keeper-Jade-114 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Annex-Copper-314 or Annex-Silver-314 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-14","options":["Keeper-Indigo-114 / Annex-Silver-314","Keeper-Jade-114 / Annex-Copper-314","Keeper-Jade-114 / Annex-Silver-314","Keeper established; annex not established.","Keeper not established; annex established.","Neither keeper nor annex established.","The record contradicts itself.","Keeper-Indigo-114 / Annex-Copper-314"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 815: Ranger-Coral-115, not Ranger-Azure-115, is responsible. Gallery-Lilac-315, not Gallery-Amber-315, is the destination.","answer":"Ranger-Coral-115 / Gallery-Lilac-315","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 815: either Ranger-Coral-115 or Ranger-Azure-115 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Gallery-Lilac-315 or Gallery-Amber-315 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-15","options":["Neither ranger nor gallery established.","The record contradicts itself.","Ranger-Coral-115 / Gallery-Lilac-315","Ranger-Coral-115 / Gallery-Amber-315","Ranger-Azure-115 / Gallery-Lilac-315","Ranger-Azure-115 / Gallery-Amber-315","Ranger established; gallery not established.","Ranger not established; gallery established."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 816: Porter-Jade-116, not Porter-Copper-116, is responsible. Depot-Silver-316, not Depot-Indigo-316, is the destination.","answer":"Porter-Jade-116 / Depot-Silver-316","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 816: either Porter-Jade-116 or Porter-Copper-116 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Depot-Silver-316 or Depot-Indigo-316 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-16","options":["Porter-Copper-116 / Depot-Indigo-316","Porter established; depot not established.","Porter not established; depot established.","Neither porter nor depot established.","The record contradicts itself.","Porter-Jade-116 / Depot-Silver-316","Porter-Jade-116 / Depot-Indigo-316","Porter-Copper-116 / Depot-Silver-316"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 817: Pilot-Azure-117, not Pilot-Lilac-117, is responsible. Quay-Amber-317, not Quay-Coral-317, is the destination.","answer":"Pilot-Azure-117 / Quay-Amber-317","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 817: either Pilot-Azure-117 or Pilot-Lilac-117 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Quay-Amber-317 or Quay-Coral-317 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-17","options":["Pilot-Azure-117 / Quay-Amber-317","Pilot-Azure-117 / Quay-Coral-317","Pilot-Lilac-117 / Quay-Amber-317","Pilot-Lilac-117 / Quay-Coral-317","Pilot established; quay not established.","Pilot not established; quay established.","Neither pilot nor quay established.","The record contradicts itself."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 818: Curator-Copper-118, not Curator-Silver-118, is responsible. Hangar-Indigo-318, not Hangar-Jade-318, is the destination.","answer":"Curator-Copper-118 / Hangar-Indigo-318","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 818: either Curator-Copper-118 or Curator-Silver-118 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Hangar-Indigo-318 or Hangar-Jade-318 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-18","options":["Curator not established; hangar established.","Neither curator nor hangar established.","The record contradicts itself.","Curator-Copper-118 / Hangar-Indigo-318","Curator-Copper-118 / Hangar-Jade-318","Curator-Silver-118 / Hangar-Indigo-318","Curator-Silver-118 / Hangar-Jade-318","Curator established; hangar not established."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 819: Steward-Lilac-119, not Steward-Amber-119, is responsible. Harbor-Coral-319, not Harbor-Azure-319, is the destination.","answer":"Steward-Lilac-119 / Harbor-Coral-319","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 819: either Steward-Lilac-119 or Steward-Amber-119 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Harbor-Coral-319 or Harbor-Azure-319 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-19","options":["Steward-Amber-119 / Harbor-Coral-319","Steward-Amber-119 / Harbor-Azure-319","Steward established; harbor not established.","Steward not established; harbor established.","Neither steward nor harbor established.","The record contradicts itself.","Steward-Lilac-119 / Harbor-Coral-319","Steward-Lilac-119 / Harbor-Azure-319"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 820: Marshal-Silver-120, not Marshal-Indigo-120, is responsible. Atrium-Jade-320, not Atrium-Copper-320, is the destination.","answer":"Marshal-Silver-120 / Atrium-Jade-320","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 820: either Marshal-Silver-120 or Marshal-Indigo-120 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Atrium-Jade-320 or Atrium-Copper-320 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-20","options":["The record contradicts itself.","Marshal-Silver-120 / Atrium-Jade-320","Marshal-Silver-120 / Atrium-Copper-320","Marshal-Indigo-120 / Atrium-Jade-320","Marshal-Indigo-120 / Atrium-Copper-320","Marshal established; atrium not established.","Marshal not established; atrium established.","Neither marshal nor atrium established."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 821: Warden-Amber-121, not Warden-Coral-121, is responsible. Orchard-Azure-321, not Orchard-Lilac-321, is the destination.","answer":"Warden-Amber-121 / Orchard-Azure-321","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 821: either Warden-Amber-121 or Warden-Coral-121 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Orchard-Azure-321 or Orchard-Lilac-321 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-21","options":["Warden established; orchard not established.","Warden not established; orchard established.","Neither warden nor orchard established.","The record contradicts itself.","Warden-Amber-121 / Orchard-Azure-321","Warden-Amber-121 / Orchard-Lilac-321","Warden-Coral-121 / Orchard-Azure-321","Warden-Coral-121 / Orchard-Lilac-321"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 822: Keeper-Indigo-122, not Keeper-Jade-122, is responsible. Annex-Copper-322, not Annex-Silver-322, is the destination.","answer":"Keeper-Indigo-122 / Annex-Copper-322","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 822: either Keeper-Indigo-122 or Keeper-Jade-122 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Annex-Copper-322 or Annex-Silver-322 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-22","options":["Keeper-Indigo-122 / Annex-Silver-322","Keeper-Jade-122 / Annex-Copper-322","Keeper-Jade-122 / Annex-Silver-322","Keeper established; annex not established.","Keeper not established; annex established.","Neither keeper nor annex established.","The record contradicts itself.","Keeper-Indigo-122 / Annex-Copper-322"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 823: Ranger-Coral-123, not Ranger-Azure-123, is responsible. Gallery-Lilac-323, not Gallery-Amber-323, is the destination.","answer":"Ranger-Coral-123 / Gallery-Lilac-323","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 823: either Ranger-Coral-123 or Ranger-Azure-123 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Gallery-Lilac-323 or Gallery-Amber-323 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-23","options":["Neither ranger nor gallery established.","The record contradicts itself.","Ranger-Coral-123 / Gallery-Lilac-323","Ranger-Coral-123 / Gallery-Amber-323","Ranger-Azure-123 / Gallery-Lilac-323","Ranger-Azure-123 / Gallery-Amber-323","Ranger established; gallery not established.","Ranger not established; gallery established."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 824: Porter-Jade-124, not Porter-Copper-124, is responsible. Depot-Silver-324, not Depot-Indigo-324, is the destination.","answer":"Porter-Jade-124 / Depot-Silver-324","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 824: either Porter-Jade-124 or Porter-Copper-124 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Depot-Silver-324 or Depot-Indigo-324 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-24","options":["Porter-Copper-124 / Depot-Indigo-324","Porter established; depot not established.","Porter not established; depot established.","Neither porter nor depot established.","The record contradicts itself.","Porter-Jade-124 / Depot-Silver-324","Porter-Jade-124 / Depot-Indigo-324","Porter-Copper-124 / Depot-Silver-324"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 825: Pilot-Azure-125, not Pilot-Lilac-125, is responsible. Quay-Amber-325, not Quay-Coral-325, is the destination.","answer":"Pilot-Azure-125 / Quay-Amber-325","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 825: either Pilot-Azure-125 or Pilot-Lilac-125 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Quay-Amber-325 or Quay-Coral-325 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-25","options":["Pilot-Azure-125 / Quay-Amber-325","Pilot-Azure-125 / Quay-Coral-325","Pilot-Lilac-125 / Quay-Amber-325","Pilot-Lilac-125 / Quay-Coral-325","Pilot established; quay not established.","Pilot not established; quay established.","Neither pilot nor quay established.","The record contradicts itself."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 826: Curator-Copper-126, not Curator-Silver-126, is responsible. Hangar-Indigo-326, not Hangar-Jade-326, is the destination.","answer":"Curator-Copper-126 / Hangar-Indigo-326","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 826: either Curator-Copper-126 or Curator-Silver-126 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Hangar-Indigo-326 or Hangar-Jade-326 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-26","options":["Curator not established; hangar established.","Neither curator nor hangar established.","The record contradicts itself.","Curator-Copper-126 / Hangar-Indigo-326","Curator-Copper-126 / Hangar-Jade-326","Curator-Silver-126 / Hangar-Indigo-326","Curator-Silver-126 / Hangar-Jade-326","Curator established; hangar not established."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 827: Steward-Lilac-127, not Steward-Amber-127, is responsible. Harbor-Coral-327, not Harbor-Azure-327, is the destination.","answer":"Steward-Lilac-127 / Harbor-Coral-327","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 827: either Steward-Lilac-127 or Steward-Amber-127 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Harbor-Coral-327 or Harbor-Azure-327 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-27","options":["Steward-Amber-127 / Harbor-Coral-327","Steward-Amber-127 / Harbor-Azure-327","Steward established; harbor not established.","Steward not established; harbor established.","Neither steward nor harbor established.","The record contradicts itself.","Steward-Lilac-127 / Harbor-Coral-327","Steward-Lilac-127 / Harbor-Azure-327"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 828: Marshal-Silver-128, not Marshal-Indigo-128, is responsible. Atrium-Jade-328, not Atrium-Copper-328, is the destination.","answer":"Marshal-Silver-128 / Atrium-Jade-328","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 828: either Marshal-Silver-128 or Marshal-Indigo-128 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Atrium-Jade-328 or Atrium-Copper-328 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-28","options":["The record contradicts itself.","Marshal-Silver-128 / Atrium-Jade-328","Marshal-Silver-128 / Atrium-Copper-328","Marshal-Indigo-128 / Atrium-Jade-328","Marshal-Indigo-128 / Atrium-Copper-328","Marshal established; atrium not established.","Marshal not established; atrium established.","Neither marshal nor atrium established."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 829: Warden-Amber-129, not Warden-Coral-129, is responsible. Orchard-Azure-329, not Orchard-Lilac-329, is the destination.","answer":"Warden-Amber-129 / Orchard-Azure-329","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 829: either Warden-Amber-129 or Warden-Coral-129 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Orchard-Azure-329 or Orchard-Lilac-329 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-29","options":["Warden established; orchard not established.","Warden not established; orchard established.","Neither warden nor orchard established.","The record contradicts itself.","Warden-Amber-129 / Orchard-Azure-329","Warden-Amber-129 / Orchard-Lilac-329","Warden-Coral-129 / Orchard-Azure-329","Warden-Coral-129 / Orchard-Lilac-329"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 830: Keeper-Indigo-130, not Keeper-Jade-130, is responsible. Annex-Copper-330, not Annex-Silver-330, is the destination.","answer":"Keeper-Indigo-130 / Annex-Copper-330","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 830: either Keeper-Indigo-130 or Keeper-Jade-130 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Annex-Copper-330 or Annex-Silver-330 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-30","options":["Keeper-Indigo-130 / Annex-Silver-330","Keeper-Jade-130 / Annex-Copper-330","Keeper-Jade-130 / Annex-Silver-330","Keeper established; annex not established.","Keeper not established; annex established.","Neither keeper nor annex established.","The record contradicts itself.","Keeper-Indigo-130 / Annex-Copper-330"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 831: Ranger-Coral-131, not Ranger-Azure-131, is responsible. Gallery-Lilac-331, not Gallery-Amber-331, is the destination.","answer":"Ranger-Coral-131 / Gallery-Lilac-331","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 831: either Ranger-Coral-131 or Ranger-Azure-131 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Gallery-Lilac-331 or Gallery-Amber-331 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-31","options":["Neither ranger nor gallery established.","The record contradicts itself.","Ranger-Coral-131 / Gallery-Lilac-331","Ranger-Coral-131 / Gallery-Amber-331","Ranger-Azure-131 / Gallery-Lilac-331","Ranger-Azure-131 / Gallery-Amber-331","Ranger established; gallery not established.","Ranger not established; gallery established."],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"},{"ainglish":"Control record 832: Porter-Jade-132, not Porter-Copper-132, is responsible. Depot-Silver-332, not Depot-Indigo-332, is the destination.","answer":"Porter-Jade-132 / Depot-Silver-332","calibration":true,"english":"Control record 832: either Porter-Jade-132 or Porter-Copper-132 is responsible; this is unsettled. Either Depot-Silver-332 or Depot-Indigo-332 is the destination; this also is unsettled.","id":"sat-inr-calibration-32","options":["Porter-Copper-132 / Depot-Indigo-332","Porter established; depot not established.","Porter not established; depot established.","Neither porter nor depot established.","The record contradicts itself.","Porter-Jade-132 / Depot-Silver-332","Porter-Jade-132 / Depot-Indigo-332","Porter-Copper-132 / Depot-Silver-332"],"question":"Which complete responsible-party/destination assignment is established by this record?"}],"kind":"saturnia.ainglish.idempotent-no-retry.same-roster-items.v1","sha256":"ab342296624b1a7e21007a3184b12bbc64bf1523ddb5d3206e5a9725337c0aab"}